The cheapest PAYG contract offered by BT's subsidiary EE gets you 500 minutes of phone calls for 10 pounds. Which also buys you 10GB of internet and unlimited texts.
Meanwhile, 500 minutes of phone calls from a BT payphone would set you back 250 pounds!
So, it's obviously not the poor who benefits from pay phones. Except maybe a subset of homeless people who can't commit to a PAYG contract. Seems like it'd be more economical for BT/EE to just handout phones at homeless shelters and shutdown this ridiculous relic.
https://shop.ee.co.uk/sim-only/pay-as-you-go-phones
https://www.bt.com/pricing/current/Call_Charges_boo/3545_d0e...
> Some of the call boxes we plan to protect are used to make relatively low numbers of calls. But if one of those calls is from a distressed child, an accident victim or someone contemplating suicide, that public phone line can be a lifeline at a time of great need.
Plus not everyone have smartphone and these maybe the only way those on the street especially the homeless can call others.
Anyone who thinks public phone boxes will play a role in a national emergency is fooling themselves.
This is pretty optimistic, landlines get congested during major crises too. do-do-dee all circuits are busy now, please try your call again later.
This is quite clearly outlined in the article.
https://www.mylondon.news/whats-on/whats-on-news/gallery/lon...
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6827862...
It seems entirely reasonable that most, perhaps nearly all, boxes will remain.
The consultation process and negligible transfer fee of £1 heavily skew in favour of keeping the iconic phone boxes.
The review criteria are also the least controversial I have read in years, it seems any boxes to be removed are very much unwanted.