A tablet shown in a movie is a perfectly fine and perfectly usable example of a publication of an ornamental design.
A tablet shown in a movie is a perfectly fine and perfectly usable example of a publication of an ornamental design.
Samsung's theft of Apple's very specific decorative designs (witness their remote that looked EXACTLY like an iPhone 4) is so egregious that if it were, say, a nameless Chinese entrepreneur selling knockoff purses in Chinatown no-one would be especially surprised if their stock were seized and a few people imprisoned over it. This isn't, say, Ferrari suing Maserati for creating a coupe with four wheels, it's Ferrari suing Hyundai for creating a coupe that looks EXACTLY like the current model Ferrari. No offense to Hyundai -- they pay actual designers to design their ugly-ass cars.
http://electroniclover.info/samsung-touch-control-rmc30d-uni...
I'm well aware that Samsung's tablets have different aspect ratios to Apple's. I made no claim _they_ were EXACTLY anything.
> it's Ferrari suing Hyundai for creating a coupe
> that looks EXACTLY like the current model Ferrari.
s/Ferrari/Apple/g; s/Hyundai/Samsung/g; s/coupe/pad/gIt was your analogy.
Microsoft Surface came out _after_ the iPhone. But what the hell does that have to do with anything?