> and 6 because Dr. Meyerowitz-Katz was suspicious of them.”
That's a bit frightening, of course someone would be suspicious if results were going against his/her opinions
That's a bit frightening, of course someone would be suspicious if results were going against his/her opinions
From further up, though we don't _quite_ know the details, but it's not like he went "Oh well some random person disagrees with them so better throw them out"