Hacker News Reader

> This report describe pgagroal in relationship to 3 other PostgreSQL connection pool implementations, which we will call "a", "b" and "c".

Why? Just why! Please put up names rather than saving faces for other poolers!

> Why? Just why! Please put up names rather than saving faces for other poolers!

This is an [interesting] joke, right?

No? Oracle started putting clauses in their sales contracts limiting publishing benchmarks because they performed poorly in a published report.

I mean in this context. Seems implausible you could sneak a DeWitt Clause into a FOSS license.

Also make the benchmark code open source, so that we can run it on our own hardware and judge it's relevancy.

That's what's being used...