Linked Lists are patented, every piece of code is in violation

It doesn't seem to cover all linked lists, only data structures where each element is part of two or more otherwise independent lists (so it doesn't cover list tail sharing either).

I'm not very good at reading patents, so please point out the claims that contradict me.

There's already a discussion about that, see: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2873795

Great, now we just wait that Microsoft, Googrola, Samsung or Apple buys the patent :/

Unless they Reverse-engineer is there any other way to know?