On most new processors, Intel just suggests using REP STOSB and REP MOVSB for memset and memcpy respectively. That's not in the benchmark as far as I can see.
It's still not always faster: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/43343231/enhanced-rep-mo...
While there are still startup costs, the overhead of calling a function (especially via a PLT) and incurring instruction cache misses is hard to demonstrate in a microbenchmark, while rep movsb encodes more compactly than many flavors of call. In an actual application though, the "slower" but smaller implementation can often win (https://research.google/pubs/pub50338.pdf and https://research.google/pubs/pub48320.pdf)