I just always find it interesting. No customer has ever asked me for the plot of distortion products vs freq for a loudspeaker in pro-audio. Or the metallurgic compositions of the tinsel wires.
I just always find it interesting. No customer has ever asked me for the plot of distortion products vs freq for a loudspeaker in pro-audio. Or the metallurgic compositions of the tinsel wires.
Digital isn't perfect but compared to what an analogue playback system does, it might as well be considered as such. It gave them nothing to write about when a $120 disc player could reproduce audio as well as a $2000 player. They seemed to have doubled and tripled down on the nonsense ever since.
Not sure why audiophiles fall for it, other than the general "tweakiness" aspect of some audio enthusiasts who are always looking for the next thing to spend their money on. It's tough to have a hobby when if you buy the gear, you have little to complain about until it's made obsolete.
I'm on the opposite side of finding it interesting though. There is a lot of "your ears aren't good enough" dog piling going on to shout down any doubts about cables and whatnot.
That element probably ends up being some sort of counterbalancing social force to unbridled gadget consumption whose end product is $3000 cables.
Not denying that there is a lot of hogwash to go along as well...
Maybe the problem is nothing they make can compare to used Stax electrostatics.
I think there's a social custom in the community, that relates to "you can be your own expert." That is, opinions are weighted by some function other than technical knowledge and expertise, such as status as a musician, enthusiasm, cost of equipment owned, etc. Nobody wants to come out and say: "You're imagining things." Technical discussions often erupt into flame wars.
And there are some areas where things are probably measurably different, and it boils down to taste, but the measurements are hard to do. I can hear differences between the two instruments that I own. Does that mean I'm bonkers?
At the same time, engineers who aren't immersed in this field tend to be polarized into two extremes: Some are audiophiles. Others simply dismiss everything as audiophile nonsense.
In my typical setup, I try and work as a stage hand, and let normal FOH and monitor engineers work with the products, where I can observe all the issues that crop up. That way I can get clean feedback from band members, and production staff without, being tainted by association with the brand.
They are all shiny toys, but care surprisingly little about acoustics — a field that is known to have the highest impact on any listening environment. Then you have to realize you are human. I hear the same mix differently, when I listen to it for a second time without a break inbetween. I listen to it differently at any time of the day, depending on the mood, if I ate, depending on the weather. And I need to know these differences in perception because I have to deal with them when mixing.
Isn't the end goal of Hifi to listen to music in a way you can enjoy? Of course looks and how a setup "feels" makes a difference there, but I got the feeling many audiophiles are beyond enjoying music. I guess there is a reason why they are 99% male