Google Quietly Rolls Out The Chrome Extension To Bring +1 To The Entire Web
techcrunch.com
techcrunch.com
It's unbelievable to me how freaking useless all of google's shit is with regard to this problem. You can use multiple accounts, but none of their software, including their browser is multi-account aware.
It's still valid.
Each profile is isolated from the others in much the same way that Incognito and normal Chrome sessions are isolated. It's pretty handy.
$ firefox -P gaccount1
$ firefox -P gaccount2
It's just that Google is the one site large enough to have users that NEED multiple accounts and have reasons to switch between them. You're arguing against the cookie model and the fact that modern browsers are still complete shit at managing an identity and related cookies.
(edit)Rambling here, with the new Cookie API in Chrome, would it not be possible to switch between profiles quickly using an extension? I understand the frustation is that we want to have one tab/window with one account and one with another, but this solution could surely mitigate some use cases.
Also, I hope my comments aren't interpreted the wrong way. I just started a new project with a new team today with a new centralized gmail account. This means coordinating between my account and the central account and between those two accounts and other team members. I understand the frustration, I just don't know if rage at Google is the most appropriate direction of attention.
1) on secondary account setup imap/pop3 access. Setup primary account to read that. Grant access for primary account to use secondary email address (allows to change the from email)
2) in the app settings of your second domain, setup mailing list that has your primary email as the only destination. Enable the mailing list to accept any incoming email. Grant access for primary account to use secondary email address (allows to change the from email)
There are probably more ways, I know of few people that have 5 email addresses all setup to route through one core account.
I wish they could make this simple.
I've had a google apps account since the beginning and it's amazing to me that despite the number of people that fall into that early adopter category on google apps, they have failed repeatedly at rolling out services to apps users.
Like, probably 80% of their stuff works transparently with either type of account. It kinda seems to stand to reason that their HUGE project that integrates most Google services into it and is the new "main way" of accessing your account... may not have had the attention to make it fully compatible with a small subset of their users.
That, and it definitely warrants a post containing 2 explicatives being the top comment on this post? (edit: I'm not upset with the language, I'm just surprised. I'm used to the shorter more explicative posts being discouraged. I, myself, don't mind, like I said, just surprised.)
On top of that their migration plans for moving from apps accounts to full accounts are unclear and continually moving targets.
It really is awful.
And who gives a fuck how much swearing a post has? :P
The fee was negligible, but what I don't understand is how can they have my app listed but claim I'm not verified, when that is a prerequisite? This is not a social networking feature. This directly affects my business, but Google couldn't care less. And it points to real incompetence, which is not surprising given their history of almost non-existent customer service, but still disappointing considering this is probably a software issue.
Wouldn't the same idea be Facebook releasing a Chrome extension for their "Like" button...?
Just sayin'.
Oh yes, how reasonable.
This is just another part of their plan to index the web, and get more signals for their web index building, just like the Google Toolbars that tracked everything you did on the web.
This is a bit more precise, but not a radical change, I guess.