In your mind, an independent/skeptical/critical journalist is a propagandist, and Pfizer is a neutral public health authority? Time to wake up.
Pfizer also has a potential conflict of interest, which is why people are talking about what they've done going through the scientific process. That's very different from where Berenson makes up something outrageous, hits send, and then complains about being “canceled” if he gets criticized by real journalists or scientists because Pfizer employees people who are experts in the field, runs studies following standard methodology, publishes their data and analysis and it's critically examined by independent experts. That doesn't mean it's perfect but it's a completely different level of rigor than a self-published screed.
If Alex Berenson was saying we should all get the vaccine he would never have gathered the following he did. So don't pretend populist journalists don't have a monetary incentive to propound the material they show, either.