> that doesn't kill kids
While the numbers are low, it is not 0. This is, sadly, categorically untrue.
While the numbers are low, it is not 0. This is, sadly, categorically untrue.
The percentages still don't pan out to having such massive restrictions on children that young.
Do yourself a favor and look up leading causes of child death.
Can you assert that without them getting covid, they would have died as quickly?
> The percentages still don't pan out to having such massive restrictions on children that young.
Which was never my assertion.
I was merely pointing out that "it does not kill kids" is just not true, which it isn't.