Charles Babbage – Passages from the Life of a Philosopher
standardebooks.org
standardebooks.org
Plenty of other sections of the book hint at this. As an example, search for the word "philosopher" throughout the book. We get section headings musing about whether a Philosopher would deny being descended from Cain, quotes attributed to a recently-scalloped oyster who was also a philosopher writing in its shell, a sequence of passages titled "The Philosopher writes a Ballet —Its rehearsal —Its high moral tone —Its rejection on the ground of the probable combustion of the Opera-house", and so on and so on. Does Babbage consider himself a philosopher? Maybe (probably, even -- he clearly had a good opinion of himself in any case), but he is also well aware of how the public perceives such people.
In other words, Babbage is doing a "bit" and playing with the public perception of him and of scientists of the time (and even now) -- i.e. as being so removed from the real world that they not only can't explain something, but can't even understand why they can't explain it. Which is an understandable thing to do, particularly if you're a mathematician and engineer writing an autobiography for a lay audience.
This doesn't mean that he was actually good at explaining anything, of course, or that he wasn't in fact a frustrated genius. It just means that he was aware of how he was perceived and was capable of a little humour at his own expense.
That is, this an instance of the heuristic, “how do they react to being asked to do something known to be impossible?”
Volkswagen emissions software scandal comes to mind.
It's been a while since I read it, but I definitely got the sense that that was very much how he felt and he wasn't playing it up for comedy. He wasn't the most likable or relatable guy but he certainly was passionate.
On the other hand, Babbage never really finished the Analytical Engine. It was always in pre-alpha. In a sense, there is no Analytical Engine. Only a lifetime of sketches for various parts and extensive commentary on how the various parts might fit together. An actual implementation requires making a lot of hard decisions, and basically inventing a fair bit as well.
It's clear the Plan 28 folks appreciate all this, of course. They've appropriately started with a complete review of the literature:
> With the first-pass inspection of the manuscript archive complete, attention has turned to analysis and interpretation, and organising the findings to aid navigation. Babbage shed versions of the design as it developed in the form of ‘Plans’ – large ‘systems drawings’ which serve as developmental staging posts – the main ones of which number Plan 1 through to Plan 28.
This might hint at why Babbage ultimately failed, really. He was a tinkerer and he didn't commit to a design. It was always provisional. When he ran into a minor hitch, or had another good idea, he would go back to the drawing board and start over. If he had just committed and scaled up the original, much simpler and fully-designed difference engine he had been contracted for, he might just have got the funding to continue more theoretical and larger-scale work with thinking machines.
https://standardebooks.org/about
What an awesome project.
[1] https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Index:On_the_economy_of_machi...
[2] https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Wikisource:Community_collabor...
I think by the end of Babbage's life the parts could have been manufactured, but by then both Babbage and his financiers had moved on.
"Even the car chase seemed tacked on!"
I'm not sure a Hollywood version of this history would benefit the world in any way.