I’m still really skeptical of that trash fire going anywhere. Including my day job.
I can only thing of one application, and it still have to deliver:
Providing mesh network of wifi, LoRA or 5g where the node are administered by individuals.
The nodes are mining a proof of coverage. And effectively being payed to deliver a service ( providing wifi/LoRA/5g coverage )
The nodes cannot trust each other, and having a decentralized ledger help them split the bill and compensate the nodes for their work.
In my view it would provide a “last miles delivery of coverage”
I have a few project in mind that I won’t mention here. The crypto they are using is not subject to much speculation.
That my favorite use of that tech stack. ( since the decentralized land ledger projects seems to not go anywhere )
I've found the images here to be a good quick and dirty summary: https://www.gsma.com/identity/decentralised-identity
Good places to look around in: Fxhash (amazing generative art market that creates uniques through interaction between the code and the blockchain) Hic Et Nunc (now multiple sites, fully decentralised art market) OBJKT (sort of a better UI for Tezos NFTs, same stuff as in Hic).
This is a common fallacy I’ve seen among developers - the idea that because the technical solution is inferior it’s social value must be inferior. Blockchain is not a technical solution, it’s a social solution. At least as far as NFTs it has solved an insoluble problem, which was no one trusted anyone in particular with a ledger about digital art ownership - but they do trust everyone/a a large group that’s incentivised to keep hosting it, and has problem to be tampering resistant.
Buying illegal drugs online