This is the first time I've read some way of looking at quantum physics that actually make sense. I hope it is indeed correct and all those ~smart people who were putting their ridiculously complex theory of quantum physics at our throats end up being ridiculed.
This reminds me of Feynman's famous quote: "If you think you understand quantum mechanics then you don't understand quantum mechanics." Frankly, I'm baffled how some scientists still clinge to classical physics and absolute determinism, just because they describe our macroscopic world nicely. People have tried to argue against quantum principles 100 years ago and some still do it today, even going so far as to believe that the entire universe conspires against us since the big bang (which is what supetdeterminism boils down to in light of things like entanglement) rather than accept the inconvenient truth: our universe is much stranger than classical physicists could have envisioned.
Going with "if it is not weird enough, it can't be right" doesn't seem very scientific to me.
Nobody does that. We follow the math and the experimental results. There is friction against accepting what the results tell us, which is the odd thing.
You're exactly the target audience for her content :) .
I suppose. It does seem pretty logical that statistical independence between measurement and particles could be violated, and I am just a newbie. If someone could explain why people overlooked this fact I would be very interested.