> This is what happens when you "sow beans", the protocol burns them and in exchange you get a locked-in interest rate (in pods), and you get paid out when all the lenders in front of you (the pod line) get paid out.

ohh, i misunderstood the lockup conditions around lending. so the protocol properly does decrease circulation. still at the expense of an increased maximum supply, but with the rate at which that new supply enters circulation controlled for independently (by the "bean supply").

i don't see any mechanism to decrease the maximum supply. over the very long term, it seems that the system becomes increasingly unstable the longer that the bean demand growth is below the Weather rate. the bean demand growth ought to have some resemblance to the general rate of return, so the uncertain thing here is: will lenders lend at advantageous rates to Beanstalk after it establishes itself as a good creditor? or will lenders demand an outsized return for lending to Beanstalk, on account of their money being locked up for an indeterminant duration? i see arguments for both, but it's pretty academic: it looks like there's enough runway in the system that these "very long term" preponderances are mostly irrelevant in this stage of defi.

interesting project.