Because you refuse to understand that we only want suspect communications, not all of them, and also that we don't want to break encryption to acheive that because the person might as well be innocent.
> Yet it is still illegal and people are still being arrested for ordering drugs and producing their own, how curious.
You won't until there is a problem that alerts the authority.
> Did that criminal use drugs or end-to-end-encryption?
Yes and yes, add much more.
> We both know that this is simply not true.
I disagree.
Anyway, I've been prosecuted on wrong basis myself, and got out winner, I'm not affraid this is going to change. I trust my state, my police, my judges, who are independent and who will have to issue a mandate based on serious suspicious before they read my communications.
Because, that's how present reality works.