Or maybe "Teller (magician (of duo Penn & Teller (known from Fool Me (a British TV show)))) reveals his secrets"
Just because you would have preferred a story of a bank teller… and had it been this way, another one like you would have complained that it's not about the famous magician.
Language is ambiguous. "Teller" is his name, there is no conceit in the headline.
And as long as there is no conceit, your accusation is out of place.
> Would you really have preferred "Teller (magician) reveals his secrets"?
Yes. Or even just "Magician reveals his secrets". > Language is ambiguous. "Teller" is his name, there is no conceit in the headline.
The ambiguity seems (to me) to have been exploited for clicks. But I see here that other people here seem to be more familiar with the magician than with the (possibly outdated) profession.I'm an old fart.
Because stumbling across something that surprises us as isn't what we first expected is good.
If semantic precision was the goal, using the original titles wouldn't be mandated, but prohibited.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teller_(magician)
TIL: Penn & Teller met as painters at art school!
I'm still of the opinion that the title is misleading, but I accept that most people think differently than myself. That's been a common thread my entire life )) I think that a popular technology company even made a slogan out of it.
"Ah, I see Teller is a well known pop culture figure. My mistake." would be a more appropriate way to respond. Searching "Teller" on Google outputs the magician as the first four results. It's not like it's some super small name.
Be nice, I'm sure it took some genuine effort on OP's part not to tell you that they don't even own a TV.
I accept that it makes me a weirdo. I just don't like the passiveness of the TV, but I really did not mean any insult to yupper32. He can enjoy whatever medium he likes.
I may be more familiar with his work than the average person because of his connection to my high school. But saying the title was "clickbait" (as if there is some large contingent of people that were hoping to hear the secrets of bank tellers) is a little much.
What's much more interesting about your comment is that is evidence of some of the points Teller makes in his piece. You were totally misdirected. You were sure of one pattern when another one was being used. You walked away, indignant and in disbelief.
> What's much more interesting about your comment is that is evidence of some of
> the points Teller makes in his piece. You were totally misdirected.
That is interesting. It does sound like something that I should read. Thank you.We, from The Society, greatly appreciate your comment. Please keep up the good work and take this in jest.
it is not like the title was "learn this clever trick from Einstein" and then you figure out the Einstein in the article is a dog.
Imagine something like:
"newly revealed documents show Edward Teller was a Soviet asset"
2. If not, what incredible secrets were you hoping to learn from a bank teller?