Hacker News Reader

This is kinda an absurd take. On one hand you have people saying 'hey if you want x congress should make it law, the courts can't do anything about it.' but you're saying 'if Congress passes a law it won't work and only the courts can do something about x' it can't be both...

View on HN

> but you're saying 'if Congress passes a law it won't work and only the courts can do something about x'

That isn't at all what they were saying.

They were saying that instead of Congress trying to make rules through the legislative process (which moves to slow to work), Congress needs to create and authorize a federal agency to make these rules (like the FAA or FCC.) The portion about the supreme court is regarding whether such an agency would be deemed constitutional.

IMO the people with said power and responsibility just want to finger point. But what do you do when no one is willing to put on the pants?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com