The other thing is that unlike with depression where you have to squint really hard to see much of an effect from most treatments, there are reasonably effective treatments for mania and hypomania, including good old lithium. So if you're being treated, while you might still suffer from regular bouts of depression, you'll likely have much reduced or even eliminated hypomanic or manic symptoms. So it's not unusual to see manic depressives who are treated showing very few manic symptoms for years on end.
Once someone demonstrably has issues with mania, yes, sure, I understand wanting to prevent it, but in a lot of cases I see very little separation from actual mania and "I felt good one day" (which if someone were depressed may feel very weird).
There's also strong arguments that one or two manic or hypomanic episodes are not enough evidence for a bipolar diagnosis.
As someone who's been clinically depressed, your examples seem contrived to me. Are they based on any specific evidence, and if so, would you please share with the group?
Yet, when I searched for help the diagnosis seemed rushed and I decided not to take lithium. Years later after much therapy a new psi prescribed me an SSRI. It did wonders to my anxiety and subsided the thoughts of taking my life. But the main motivational problems persist.
Now I'm convinced to stop taking them because they make me kinda numb. It's like I miss crying or taking some issues as serious and important.
Then a question arises: just from taking SSRIs these two years and not going nuts, does that prove I'm not bipolar?
Apparently yours do not quite work well enough, since you seem to be describing aboulia, which is a depression symptom.