>Again, there’s probably some important conversation to be had around politics in the workplace but it’s really challenging to have a constructive conversation or debate when you plant your flag on one end of the political spectrum and tell the story from that biased reference point.

Your comment lacks supporting information and attempts to paint an entire political ideology with an overly broad, vague brush. Such comments do little to improve the quality of current discourse and are borderline polemic.

>The author is clearly trying to paint BLM as responsible for the property damage, which has been widely debunked.

This may be true, but you've provided no information to support your claim. What claims, specifically, have been debunked and by whom?

>It goes on and on reiterating the right-wing perspective of 2020 in an attempt to defend the data scientist.

"The right-wing perspective" is such a broad characterization and, as such, almost completely useless in this context. To which of the many perspectives of the right wing (conservative) political ideology do you refer?

You mention how challenging it has become to have a constructive conversation or debate on these topics -- and I largely agree -- but, with genuine respect, your comments here aren't constructive and contribute more to the challenge than the solution.