My personal preference is to treat HN as any other popular social media and be vigilant about what I read here.
P.S. I am not talking about this particular post. Just an opinion about the discussions on HN since you mentioned.
Edit: typo fix
My personal preference is to treat HN as any other popular social media and be vigilant about what I read here.
P.S. I am not talking about this particular post. Just an opinion about the discussions on HN since you mentioned.
Edit: typo fix
As for non-expertise; I have tried to explain several basic biostatistics concepts on here in relation to COVID threads. Generally this was because of an understandable fallacy or mistake being made. When the mistake was genuine the response to my comments is usually good. When there is an agenda the response is usual hostile or asinine. Anyway, it’s much nicer to argue with a bunch of people who value argument on HN than it is to try the same thing on r/news.
HN is much better than an arbitrary subreddit in terms of quality of conversations. Dissenting opinions are very rarely censored on HN, but dissent on subreddits is typically quelled. Subreddits are mostly echo chambers for people who want to loudly agree with each other while arguing against strawmen.
In the 3 years I've been reading HN I've observed a pretty steady increase in similarity to tech focused subreddits. Sometimes things are effectively "cross posted" on either site.
There's nothing stopping anyone on reddit from posting on HN and vice versa. I am a random example of someone who discovered reddit before HN, but was drawn to HN for what I also perceived to be better "quality of conversations".
Yes there is. About 1/3 of my comments on Reddit have been censored for being against the "official truth" of the subreddit.
But then it grew massively. Nowadays, it is no better than classic Facebook comments or r/technology on Reddit.