> In all cases, all relevant employees are "coerced" into the union contract.
It's funny because usually the libertarian response to a lot of problems is "put it in a contract". But not that kind of contract!
It's funny because usually the libertarian response to a lot of problems is "put it in a contract". But not that kind of contract!
"Right to work" only covers whether you can be made to pay union dues as part of this arrangement.
Contracts deprive non-signers of things all the time. That's kind of the point.
Do you have a problem with corporations signing "exclusive" deals with other corporations?
This is absurd.
You’re saying a corporation cannot enter into a contract to be the exclusive supplier of a widget to another corporation?
“You can’t hire anyone else willing to work for less than $x” is extortionate. Competition is necessary for a market.
Entering into a contract with multiple people to collectively bargain with a corporation = deprivation of human rights (according to some posts in this thread)
At least the GP admitted that their problem really is just "that kind of contract".