Hacker News Reader

Comment by sdz | Hacker News Reader

Fair enough, the real rights owner may have uploaded the books and videos themselves. I just think there's some irony here that Hotfile suddenly cares about copyright.

View on HN

Then you must also find irony in Warner's actions. They care so much about copyright and the law, but they can't even follow the rules.

They care about protecting their own content and using the law to do so where possible - you can not logically infer from that fact that they care about copyright or the law more generally.

Are there alternative means of protecting your content?

No.

I was questioning the assumption that because they use the law this way they are necessarily bothered one way or the other about the laws and regulations as they apply in contexts other than this one.

The WB & MPAA marketing message is that they care about the law generally, and creativity generally.

This is half of the harm WB did: people like me and you started believing Hotfile is somehow evil, disregarding the law and whatnot. We don't know that, we just subscribe to the black propaganda.

Behind WB's ham-fisted tactics may well be conflict of interests: if WB are to distribute multimedia themselves, they sure would consider Hotfile competitors and want to slow them down.

Hotfile has been in full compliance with the DMCA. Warner Bros, on the other hands...

There's no suddenly about it. Did you read the article? Hotfile created the tool WB is using to remove content. Hotfile is not responsible for their users. They are a hoster and under relevant law, DMCA, have specific responsibilities, which they seemed to have complied with.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com