How to Learn Everything: The MasterClass Diaries
longreads.com
longreads.com
It ain't glamorous, but I really like Wondrium (formerly The Great Courses). Some of them are clearly quite dated (look like they were filmed 20+ years ago) and the professors don't always have great presentation skills, but the actual content is generally strong.
It's always struck me that a lot of the classes, e.g. Aaron Sorkin on screenwriting, are perhaps the worst things to teach via a celebrity on camera.
MC to me always looked a bit like the Discovery Channel: interesting stuff, but will you really be any better afterwards? It's interesting that maybe the thing that satisfies her the most was the cooking, in other words the class where you actually practice the thing you're learning. How many of the other teachers even asked for that?
Say you had a programming class on MC. (Maybe they do?) Do they tell you to actually write code and debug it? Are there exercises? What I'm getting at is sometimes the teacher doesn't teach, but the student learns.
For example, I would love a masterclass by Linus Torvalds. But I don't want him teaching me C, that's a waste of his and my time. Instead, I want to understand his method and process. Something only he knows and which he gained from experience, not a textbook.
All that said I don’t know if that is the purpose of the Masterclass service.
I'm currently reading "The Pragmatic Programmer" and I could totally see that be a masterclass. It fits their theme.
I read his book (which is also excellent) but seeing him "live" and playing both sides of the negotiation was really an eye opener into how basic techniques, simply delivered can lead to large impacts.
I highly recommend it to engineering folks. The "mirroring" mock session is also excellent for learning basic people skills.
2) Clap
3) Shout
The Nas hip hop class is the only one of interest to me and it's only like 2 hours.
I love Nas, and consider him to be one of the greatest musicians of all time. I'm not paying 200$ for a 2 hour movie of him
I think it's a result of three things- He's very good at what he does, he understands in detail how he does it, and he knows how to explain what he does.
The downside is I think very few people meet all three of those points. Most Masterclasses fall short.