Florida bill to ban making white people feel 'discomfort' about racist history
cbc.ca
cbc.ca
https://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2022/148/BillText/File...
It explicitly allows educators to discuss the topics this CBC article says it doesn't. There's literally nothing in here saying that Florida is going to specifically ban making "white people feel discomfort". Perhaps the CBC thinks that people who are not white don't qualify as individuals?
279 (3) The Legislature acknowledges the fundamental truth that
280 all individuals are equal before the law and have inalienable
281 rights. Accordingly, instruction on the topics enumerated in
282 this section and supporting materials must be consistent with
283 the following principles of individual freedom:
284 (a) No individual is inherently racist, sexist, or
285 oppressive, whether consciously or unconsciously, solely by
286 virtue of his or her race or sex.
287 (b) No race is inherently superior to another race.
288 (c) No individual should be discriminated against or
289 receive adverse treatment solely or partly on the basis of race,
290 color, national origin, religion, disability, or sex.
291 (d) Meritocracy or traits such as a hard work ethic are not
292 racist but fundamental to the right to pursue happiness and be
293 rewarded for industry.
294 (e) An individual, by virtue of his or her race or sex,
295 does not bear responsibility for actions committed in the past
296 by other members of the same race or sex.
297 (f) An individual should not be made to feel discomfort,
298 guilt, anguish, or any other form of psychological distress on
299 account of his or her race.
300
301 Instructional personnel may facilitate discussions and use
302 curricula to address, in an age-appropriate manner, the topics
303 of sexism, slavery, racial oppression, racial segregation, and
304 racial discrimination, including topics relating to the
305 enactment and enforcement of laws resulting in sexism, racial
306 oppression, racial segregation, and racial discrimination.
307 However, classroom instruction and curriculum may not be used to
308 indoctrinate or persuade students to a particular point of view
309 inconsistent with the principles of this subsection or state
310 academic standards.- An individual is not responsible for someone else's mistakes
- An individual should not be shamed on account of their race
Those are perfectly logical ideals.
It's pretty obvious which demographic the bill is aimed at, despite its race-neutral language.
The beauty of this legislation is that its net effect will be to stoke the "woke mob" even further by confirming their fantasies about white fragility. Thus further promoting divisiveness and distrust. Which is of course what they sides ultimately want.
The whole point of laws is, they should make sense when you reverse race or leave out race completely.
And this is why critical race theory is cancer... its always one sided, victims are always darker and perpetrators are always lighter shades.
This is unnecessary. The article is poorly compiled, however.
This bill primarily serves to ride conservative viewpoints into education so I'm sure the initial premise is to stir the voters.
How do you cover segregation without talking about how white people enforced it?
Or how the GI bill functionally only applies to white veterans (because of segregation)
How redlining and sunset towns prevented African Americans from living in “white areas”
Similar for slavery in the US, or the related pre-police groups existing to enforce slavery.
And the civil war: conservatives (now the gop) are hellbent on labeling not a war about “states rights”, when it was clearly and explicitly stated to be about slavery.
We can also look at the trail of tears, and other attempts to systematically exterminate native Americans, or acquisition of Native American land
You cannot teach about any of these subjects without calling attention to the behaviour of white Americans. Therefore making it trivial for any white person to sue for violation of this law.
``` 103 (2) Members of the instructional staff of the public 104 schools, subject to the rules of the State Board of Education 105 and the district school board, shall teach efficiently and 106 faithfully, using the books and materials required that meet the 107 highest standards for professionalism and historical accuracy, 108 following the prescribed courses of study, and employing 109 approved methods of instruction```
...
``` 485 (4) Each district school board is responsible for the 486 content of all materials used in a classroom or otherwise made 487 available to students. Each district school board shall adopt 488 rules, and each district school superintendent shall implement 489 procedures, that: 490 (b) Provide a process for public review of, public comment 491 on, and the adoption of instructional materials ```
You neglect to mention the millions of white Americans that _supported_ the civil rights movement. Or the 500k or so of them that died in order to end the civil war and slavery. This is the kind of attitude that this bill is trying to combat. Despite what some may think, American history is far more nuanced than "white people bad".
You cannot teach the above topics, without talking about the races of the oppressor, and the oppressed, and if you talk about white people being the oppressors then little Johnny fifth grader's parents can sue, saying that they feel discomfort at the idea of little Johnny being taught that white people were the ones owning black people.
That is the intent of the law, and pretending that it isn't is a clear indication of argument in bad faith.
You are deliberately misreading it to push your politics-du-jour.
America was founded with white people saying that black people were not human. The economy was built on slavery. White people wanting to own black people is why the American civil war happened. White people were the driving force behind Jim Crow laws, segregation, etc, etc
You cannot teach any of that without being sued.
No one has said “everyone” had slaves. No one has said “everyone supported him crow laws”.
Here’s the biggest tell: the people making the most noise about CRT are the ones who like the confederate flag and statues of people who by definition committed treason, for the express purpose of owning black people.
The same people who make it harder for black people and minorities to vote.
There is one single thread that is consistent through all of this, and that is racists not wanting to be called out on being racist.
It's a good thing that we as a society don't treat all Muslims or Arabs as being responsible for the actions of jihadist terrorists. It's good that we as a society don't treat all <insert any label> as responsible for <bad thing some members of that group did>.
In every single item you listed, there were white people both doing good and bad. Some white Southerners fought to support slavery and white Northerners fought to end it. Some white people in Alabama wanted segregation but they were stopped by a white president and white national guardsmen who represented the majority of white American opinion that wanted to outlaw and stop segregation.
Stop treating hundreds of millions of people as one monolith. Stop the "us vs them" mentality. Please, stop spreading hate.
For example, someone makes an audio recording that would be illegal for a teacher to play to her classroom, but that same recording would be perfectly legal to play to the entire school as part of the morning announcements.
Or a discussion that would be illegal for a teacher to lead to his class but perfectly fine if it was the football coach and his team.