‘I was just scared’: Apple AirTags lead to stalking complaints
theguardian.com
theguardian.com
While it's true that there are better ways to stalk people, I think an AirTag brings something to the table that wasn't there before: the normalization of having stalking hardware at hand.
Buying a "stalker kit" requires me to think long and hard about stalking someone. I need to make the decision, buy the hardware, wait for it to be delivered (or, alternatively, walk into the kind of store that sells spy equipment), create an opportunity, and go for it. Most well-adjusted people wouldn't go so far.
But once AirTags normalize having these things in your keychain all the time, the "entry barrier" for stalking is lowered. All it takes is one beer too much and a split-second decision.
Whereas before you could easily have your freedom curbed by having your prior thoughts known in combination with buying the hardware. Ive seen people beat conspiracy charges on appeal but their freedom was still undermined along the way.
Now having a bunch of airtags is benign.
I do believe Apple opened a can of worms they shouldn't have, and that it's going to cause great distress to many people.
That blog is from 2020, prior to the release (maybe not the announcement, though) of AirTags. It's also probably nowhere near as widespread as Apple's device network, but it does exist.
Which is why Tile is much better in dense areas than it used to be.
After extensive googling, we found numerous reports online about AirPods Pro most likely having a bug alerting their owners about "unknown accessory". If it's true, and firmware had a bug, Apple was probably in a weird position of not being able to publicly acknowledge it, to avoid potentially giving a false sense of security to folks who actually had the real alerts.
For us the alert never reoccured, and FindMy was erroring out when we clicked on "get more info about the device", so most likely it was a bug.
[edit] Reddit thread with other similar possible bug reports: https://www.reddit.com/r/iphonehelp/comments/q3n1e5/dont_own...
Are there any Android apps that monitor bluetooth traffic for possible stowaways?
> Near the end of 2021, the company released a new Android app called Tracker Detect, which was designed to help people who own Androids discover suspicious AirTags near them
I wonder how many people are aware this even exists. I doubt Apple will be running a flashy marketing campaign for this app any time soon.
How many have this problem and have no way of knowing?
I installed the Android app mentioned in the link a while ago and have never detected one (but it only detects them when actively running, and I have no reason to think anyone would be stalking me).
⸻⸻⸻
1. My single big complaint about AirTags is that they can't be shared between Apple IDs. Presumably that will be changed in a future software upgrade. Right now, only my devices can be used to find my things and her devices her things even though we can use Find My to find each others devices.
To the stalking concerns, if the AirTag doesn't think it's lost then it doesn't chirp. It also seems to remain undetectable to others. Does that mean someone could put an AirTag on someone and as long as they are close by it won't alert others?
Even with Apple family? In Find My app, my partner and I can see all of each others' devices.
I'm the kind of neurotic person who found a loose cable harness on the underside of my fridge because the hum it made changed one day, but that's not everyone. How many people will just accept and AirTag alert as something new they have no control over?
Hopefully this makes enough noise that Tile and GPS trackers are forced to implement similar features.
However, I don't think a speaker is a requirement for Find My (I could be wrong). I don't think this has one: https://chipolo.net/en-us/products/chipolo-card-spot?cl=head...
Even if there were, you could defeat it with just a resistor across the old speaker terminals.
4 hours before notification if you have an iphone or the app on an android, which was lowered from the original plan
A. I lose my AirTag-equipped item in/on your bag/car/person.
B. I “lose” my AirTag-equipped item in/on your bag/car/person.
These are indistinguishable from one another without outside intervention. By making them expensive, Apple could raise the barrier to entry but would not stop someone from pursuing a “high value” stalking subject.
Conversely, by making them single-use (e.g., I can only activate “lost mode” once and when I do, both Apple and the person who finds it are given my information to facilitate a return), it might deter would-be stalkers.
[edit: expand “both” as necessary to include the entire family :) ]
What's craziest about this outrage to me is, if the anti-stalking feature weren't there, the most an average Joe would be able to use this for is to collect a fraction of the data about you that tech companies already collect. You're yelling at your fellow peasants because you suspect they're stealing meanwhile the King is openly pilfering everything.
That's a deliberate design feature which actually removes some of the utility as a covert device to keep hold of your own stuff.
I agree. My point is that the only reason people are reading 'stalking' and 'AirTag' in the same sentence is a failure of Apple's marketing. If they just had those features and didn't try to paint a world where your neighbors are out to get you they wouldn't be having this problem.
There were hundreds of engineers at Apple that worked on AirTags. Not a single one of them stood up and said "No". Not a single one of them went to the press and screamed about it before the launch. Not a single one said that Cook and his high up lackeys and their wives, husbands, girlfriends, boyfriends, whoever they have one night stands with, their children should be forced to be carrying publicly accessible airtags just to ensure that they still think they still think it is a great idea when then and their their wives, husbands, girlfriends, boyfriends, whoever they have one night stands with, their children are the targets. Oh no, the enlightened technorati prefers $$$ just like Joe who knows exactly nothing about what this can be used for.
* accurate - to a few feet over arbitrary distance
* private - no one other than the owner can track it
* anti-stalker - despite the privacy it’s possible to know when you’re being stalked
AirTags are useful, there was a market of similar, less private, devices before hand. And unlike the existing non-private solutions this one does actually warn people if they’re being stalked.
If you think that’s “engineers not caring about misuse” I don’t know what to say?
I would expect the number of people being stalked to starkly rise. I'd be more curious about the number of people being stalked with AirTags who don't realized it.
It seems more likely that someone who is already a stalker adopts something that makes it easier. There was an article a few weeks/months back where a mother was unhappy that her daughter was angry when she found that the mother has planted an AirTag. The mother was point blank saying stuff like “I’m not stalking her I just want to know where she is”. Iirc the daughter was an adult who didn’t live at home.
In other words stalker/possessive behavior isn’t a trivial thing, and like most behaviors of this sort isn’t something that can appear out of nowhere.
That said, I do think it would be nice if apple could provide a mechanism for other manufacturers to integrate stalker protection directly, because the current app based solution is far from ideal.