Wait, so theres been a prevailing thing about "censorship" and "platforms are allowed to dictate what content they host"
are we now moving onto "private citizens are not allowed to dictate where their content is served from?"
are we now moving onto "private citizens are not allowed to dictate where their content is served from?"
https://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2020/08/04/10-ways-eu-copyri...
> 2: Moral Rights
> Moral rights are the rights of an artist to claim authorship in their work (IE: Right to attribution), object to offensive or derogatory treatment of the work, including destroying it.
> Though moral rights are a part of the Berne Convention, of which the U.S. is a signatory, the U.S. never fully implemented moral rights into their code. Instead, it passed the Visual Artists Rights Act (VARA) a law that extended moral rights to an extremely limited subset of visual works.
> As with fair use, this limited view on moral rights is another uniquely American element. Copyright holders in the EU enjoy much broader more rights. However, this is true in much of the rest of the world as well.
In actual real life though it's not the difference between flavors of goddamn jelly, it's a serious moral concern for a lot of people.
Similarly it's not even a matter of forgiveness, or permanently staining someone's reputation over one action many years ago. These actions are ongoing and Rogan hasn't repented of them. If you believe they cause harm then you probably also believe they are currently causing ongoing harm. Which is a situation with different considerations than "someone did something bad a long time ago".
It wasn’t: “Hey Spotify, I want off your platform”
I was: “Hey Spotify! It’s me or him, you pick”