Hacker News Reader

Comment by optimalsolver | Hacker News Reader

It's also a bit rich for the US to be complaining about this kind of thing.

> also a bit rich for the US to be complaining about this kind of thing

The U.S. isn't complaining as much as shutting down a threat vector. Shooting back isn't hypocritical.

Also, you get the right to complain when you're allies, just as Germany had the right to complain when the NSA was caught tapping Merkel.

Come on everyone spies. There’s no point in establishing an embassy if you’re not also getting an understanding of both stated and unstated intentions.

That's not the issue. The issue is the US getting mad at counter-espionage by Uganda while they are themselves engaging in espionage. It's very hypocritical.

It is the issue. Everybody spies. Everybody spies and is hypocritical about it.

But USA is the most hypocritical about it. It systematically spies on its allies, with the exception of Israel and these 2 countries take active measures for some cybertools not to spy on each other. (or Israel tries to make it seem that way).

I guarantee you that the US spies on Israel and vise versa. I'd honestly be surprised if there was a single country both didn't spy on. But I'd say the same about Germany, Australia, France, Spain, UK, Russia, China, and many more.

Hell, DLI teaches Hebrew (once euphemized as "special Arabic" in some settings) [0]. That's not just for exchange/liaison officers... Not to dig up that bucket of worms, but there were Hebrew linguists aboard the USS Liberty.

[0] https://www.dliflc.edu/about/languages-at-dliflc/

That is simply false. Few countries hypocritical about counter-intelligence. You absolutely have to draw the difference between intelligence work and counter-intelligence work. Saying that going after someone for catching your spies is normal is totally insane, no one except the US does it.

If Uganda was spying on the US in the US, then you would have a point. That's not what happened.

> Come on everyone spies.

That's what they want everyone to think so that they can use it to excuse their antisocial behaviour.

Tonga, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Fiji, Peru, Mongolia... there's a very long list of countries that don't.

They would if they could. Those are mostly tiny countries with almost no resources to spy.

I don’t know about all of them, but a quick Google search shows that both Mongolia and Puru have intelligence agencies, which means very likely they have some sort of collection capability for HUMINT and/or SIGINT.

The ones that don’t have intelligence capabilities are probably the exception rather than the rule, and I doubt they’re doing out of good will vs just not having the resources for it.

I can't tell if you're being sarcastic, or genuinely giving a list of minuscule island chains, culminating in the country that's literally the universal metonym for 'middle of nowhere'.

You won't stay a world power by allowing others to attack you, even at a smaller scale with lesser weapons.

Counter-intelligence is not attack, it's defence. What this is is the US attacking Uganda and throwing a hissy fit when they defend themselves.

If those were Ugandan spies in the US they could have gotten dissappeared.

First the US is not Saudi Arabia - they won’t make any diplomat disappear.

Second - how did the US attack Uganda?

I think your comment sounds a bit biased that’s all. If you share some light - happy to accept the points raised.

Where did I say diplomats? Of course, you wouldn't disappear the diplomats. However, they almost never operate alone - whenever there is a diplomat engaged in intelligence there are almost always other assets without diplomatic status.

Offensive intelligence operations that the US has been conducting in Uganda are, well, offensive in nature, and are thus an attack. Not all attacks are an act of war.

> I think your comment sounds a bit biased that’s all. If you share some light - happy to accept the points raised.

I don't see how it is biased. The US applying sanctions on Uganda after they got caught spying by Ugandan counter-intelligence (under other pretenses, of course) is massively hypocritical. As far as I know using economic pressure to coax a country into accepting espionage is a new low. The US is trying to normalize and establish as basic expectations that weaker countries should just let it spy on them, and that's hypocritical above and beyond the norm.

Offensive counterintelligence is indeed a thing.

We don't disappear people under diplomatic cover, we PNG them just like everyone else does. And when we do catch foreign agents without diplomatic cover, we imprison them. Why kill a useful asset that could be traded for someone on our team?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuban_Five

Offensive counterintelligence is not the same as catching a spy and hacking them.

Offensive counterintelligence involves manipulation or long-term disruption of adversaries. Hacking someone's phone doesn't qualify, that's just normal defensive counterintelligence.

>We don't disappear people under diplomatic cover, we PNG them just like everyone else does.

Sure.

>nd when we do catch foreign agents without diplomatic cover, we imprison them. Why kill a useful asset that could be traded for someone on our team?

We both know that's not true. When it's more useful to trade them, that's done. When you want to send another signal, the US is not shy at all about killing them.

> When you want to send another signal, the US is not shy at all about killing them.

What information is this based on? I don't have any particularly strong opinions on this subject, but I can't recall ever reading about anything like this.

What exactly do you want evidence of? That U.S. intelligence agencies disappear people? That they do so to send a message? Or are you asking for specific examples of that happening to foreign intelligence operatives? Because you will never be able to read of an example of that happening - when we learn about people kidnapped by U.S. intelligence agencies, it's only because they were eventually released. It's an inference from the fact that US intelligence agencies kill many people for multiple reasons including sending a message, and that U.S. intelligence has clandestine facilities on American soil where they commit crimes on foreign intelligence operative (See the case of Yuri Noseko) without consequence, which have only been expanded since then - the CIA now has extraterritorial black sites, so nowadays Yuri would simply have been sent to Romania and then no record would be available of his torture unless he was released.

That's a long paragraph, but, as far as I can tell, doesn't contain a shred of the evidence or sources I asked for?

The one concrete detail you mention is 'Yuri Noseko' [Nosenko], who seemingly was a defector imprisoned for three years on suspicion of being a spy and then released. I'm not sure how this substantiates any of your claims. It appears to do the opposite.

An idealistic equality of actions using right vs. wrong is not exactly how diplomats look at things.

Agreed, but they are the ones that peddle that way of viewing things to their own population to get what they want, and they should be called out for it.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com