I liked this as well.

> MR PRICE: Matt, there’s a second point. This is derived from intelligence, intelligence in which we have confidence —

> QUESTION: Well —

> MR PRICE: — in which we have confidence, otherwise —

> QUESTION: The same confidence you had in WMD in Iraq? I mean, what —

> MR PRICE: Otherwise – otherwise – otherwise we would not be making it public in the way we are. But here’s the other point: Intelligence and evidence, these are two separate things. It is no —

What does he mean, “Intelligence and evidence are two separate things”? Is he saying that claims and evidence are different things?