Hacker News Reader

HNHacker News

Top New Best Ask Show Jobs

Comment by belval | Hacker News Reader

Parent Full thread

belval·

TIL, I didn't know that reddit allowed mods to opt-out of /r/all.

View on HN

The new option happened around 2014-07:

https://old.reddit.com/r/changelog/comments/2a32sq/experimen...

Apparently, there were some subreddits that got bombarded with unwanted comments which prompted the new feature.

I don't think most moderators don't know this option exists.

It's located on a page that you only visit once to set up the subreddit, or to make large subreddit changes. (On old reddit, not sure about new reddit)

To Reddit's credit, they have been adding new features over the years to help separate communities and ensure they are somewhat able to maintain their culture.

E.g. Crowd Control which limits the posting / commenting abilities of individual users based on their history or other heuristics.

>E.g. Crowd Control which limits the posting / commenting abilities of individual users based on their history or other heuristics.

Aren't you of the opinion this could be misused?

How so? It's a black box algorithm owned by Reddit Admins. Moderators only have the ability to set the threshold, with very vague terms (low, moderate, high, or something similar)

If admins wanted to disappear a viewpoint, it would be a lot easier to just autosuspend the accounts, or shadowban without a trace.

Just because the admins can do (and have done) worse shouldn't make Crowd Control an acceptable measure by comparison. If anything, I'd say a black box algorithm dictated by the admins is worse than the preemptory auto-mod banning that goes on in a number of political subreddits. I have little confidence the admins won't eventually use it to police subs at a mass scale without the need of the moderator.

The one sub I know opts out of r/all is r/nfl. Which is kinda strange for such a rather non controversial topic, but judging by the treats on r/all probably wise.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com