Hacker News Reader

> and tell me that most of their front-page content is a depiction of healthy sex between two loving adults

Go to [0] and tell me how that is a depiction of a healthy whatever. Also please describe how the paywall on porn sites would help poor 13 y.o. chaps not to see this.

[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hsm4poTWjMs

View on HN

Thats certainly not as bad as most mainstream pornography, regardless your argument is a red herring. Sexual content existing on one platform isn't an argument against restricting access to platforms made for sexual content.

> Sexual content existing on one platform

LOL.

So you DO think this is a sexual content.

And the difference between 'other platforms' sexual content is the lack of an exposed genitals.

What's your point?

You identify both of it as a sexual content, yet one should be cash-blocked as it doesn't depict a healthy sexual relationship between two loving[0] adults and other shouldn't be blocked the same way because... it DOES depict a healthy sexual relationship between two loving[1] adults?

[0] should be sex depicted only between a loving adults? what about a non-loving adults who does that for fun and health?

[1] really?

You're arguing against yourself. I didn't say any of that.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com