sorry. i'm trying to be eloquent here.

the gov or court was never a part of ATC union negotiation, until they decided that a legal(explicitly legal, defined, upheld in courts) strike was illegal.

what they did to a union who can protest the decision? they formally decertified it.

thats wrong in so many directions, not only in legal system favoring one side, not having a council between the parties, but also ill-defined sharp response, as well as showing that gov dont need any base to dissolve(formally - discertify) any union organization? and all this without formal involvement of the POTUS?

i thought i understood the values and boundaries of local legal system. turns out i'm lost.