Can Bitcoin be sustainable? Inside the Norwegian mine that also dries wood

The article doesn't live up to the title. Mentions "wood" twice at the beginning, "sustainability" once.

After that it's just a regular cryptocurrency article that's already been written countless times. Surprised at this low quality coming from The Guardian.

Is there a reason you submitted this?

It still can never be sustainable since the work needed is arbitrary. Any other mechanism to release more coins would work to. There is no real value extracted from solving the mathematical challenge for Bitcoin.