Yes, that's called "base rate neglect" or "base rate bias."
In a twist of irony, you can see another example of it in the distribution of terms reinvented by internet rationalists :-)
In a twist of irony, you can see another example of it in the distribution of terms reinvented by internet rationalists :-)
> Most people think of stereotyping as “Here’s one example I heard of where the out-group does something bad,” and then you correct it with “But we can’t generalize about an entire group just from one example!” It’s less obvious that you may be able to provide literally one million examples of your false stereotype and still have it be a false stereotype.