The alternative of building more and more road is untenable.
The alternative of building more and more road is untenable.
Therefore, we must install it right into your car, preferably at the factory, so you cannot remove it easily to make sure the spying data we get is of the highest quality.
They just want to spy on you, and with time control your car remotely, and they'll come up with all sorts of pretzel logic to justify it.
Spying. There are no other reasons.
I love Canada’s system. I simply got a bill in the mail in the United States based on my license plate they read, and no need to slow down traffic or deal with toll booths, or get a specific transponder for Canada.
Number of cars on the road depends on population at this point an on the housing model. We don't build "more and more roads" just to accommodate an infinitely growing number of cars. This is a mature market, no the 1950s or 1960s. If areas are deemed too congested there are already ways to limit congestion.
No, this is a tax income problem caused by EV but they are taking the 'opportunity' to bamboozle us into thinking that trackers and dynamic pricing is required and that there is no alternative.
Such as? I have not seen an alternative to variable rate tools in the US.
To install a tracker on every car along with all the infrastructure for handling and billing is calling a nuclear strike on a molehill. Again this is just some interests trying "to load the boat".
Is it just the creep factor they want to avoid, by making you do the performative act of installing the tracker yourself, and thus "consenting"?