Did you know if you make a 4x4 matrix where the columns are the (x,y,z,1) vertices of a tetrahedron, the rows of its inverse are the coefficients of the plane equations of the faces of that tetrahedron? You can also use the adjoins. Geometry is fun.
Did you know if you make a 4x4 matrix where the columns are the (x,y,z,1) vertices of a tetrahedron, the rows of its inverse are the coefficients of the plane equations of the faces of that tetrahedron? You can also use the adjoins. Geometry is fun.
But I didn’t know that rational tetrahedra (dihedral angles all rational multiples of π) were classified in 2020 https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.14232
Nice! And it's pretty easy to see why:
- in homogenous coordinates the plane equation is just dot(point, plane) = 0
- for every column (i.e. point) of a 4D matrix, exactly 3 rows (i.e. planes) of its inverse will have a dot product of 0
Accidentally discovered that when I was bored during calculus class :]
Start with the cube, and notice that when you deform it into the general parallelepiped, the volumes of all the tetrahedra stay equal to eachother.
However these 6 tets are not necessarily congruent, when I commented I was visualizing the case when the parallelepiped has equal side lengths, but in the general case the 6 tetrahedra are not congruent. However each of the 6 is congruent to at least 1 other out of the 6, since the parallepiped has reflection symmetry.