Hacker News Reader

Yeah. If the same thing happens to a brand-less garbage SSD you purchased from Aliexpress it's clearly cheat and plainly malicious and incompetence, but the Apple tag certainly made us believe there is a second reason.

Trading correctness for performance without shouting at the users "YOUR DATA IS NOT SAFE WHEN YOU DO THIS" multiple times a day in a storage is benchmark-snake-oil. Period.

View on HN

I’m not arguing for or against, I’m just pointing out that trading the possibility of data loss in the few seconds after a power cut for a difference of this magnitude actually makes sense in a lot of use cases.

My point above was that the same “cheat” (to use your word) could be applied to the unbranded SSD too, with similar performance gains.

I’m not giving Apple a pass for low flush performance, I’m saying there’s nothing I can see here that’s uniquely available to Apple that would prevent others from deferring flushes in the same way for similar performance gains - which would make sense in many cases.

The same thing happens in POSIX, most unices, including Linux itself until recently.

So there's that.

It's rather Apple's slow drive firmware checks though, that is problematic.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com