Amusing, but there's no necessary tension between criticizing Google, and still using its services. Often a monopolist has the best offering – whether because it started as the best, or they've cleared the field of any other competition, or (as in the case of the CDN and Analytics) their monopoly profits and omniscience allows them to offer a product at a price point no competitor can match.

If consumer self-help – refusing to use the monopolists' cheap, attractive offering on principle – were enough to restore a diversity of choice, there'd be no need for antitrust law. (I am very sympathetic to this view, in the long run.) But if you believe in antitrust law, and have a legitimate grievance under its logic, you can still believe in using the monopolist's cross-subsidized services while they are available.

Also, you might just want to "know thy enemy".