It’s isn’t about making money, it’s a question of what Bitcoin is and how it works.
It’s isn’t about making money, it’s a question of what Bitcoin is and how it works.
The original point was for small and ultra low overhead transactions, not as a way to make money. I am not saying the price is hitting 0 in 6 months or even 6 years, but clearly the original goal failed, interest is going away, and no use case has replaced it.
https://www.cbinsights.com/research/report/blockchain-trends...
That shows over 700% growth and your excuse is that everything is going down except for NFTs?
Meanwhile you haven't linked anything to back up your claims.
Clearly that isn’t a refutation.
You keep saying it's going down and you still haven't given any evidence of that or explained why you think that. Saying the same thing over and over more forcefully is not evidence.
What is asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
Of note, I didn’t refer to the ROI from holding coins which is way down. I suggest it take a second and consider why I didn’t make that argument.
You just keep saying that despite those graphs being up over 700%, somehow this stat you chose and haven't sourced is down.
You haven't explained in any way why you think that but you keep saying it over and over.
Wow, that’s just perfect. Do you mind if I share this thread?
This is your claim with no evidence, no source and no explanation.
This could not possibly be more ridiculous. Any search you do produces an avalanche of links that directly contradict what you are saying.
Your sources of absolutely nothing are not very convincing.
Is this a joke? This is like someone getting soaked in a flash flood while claiming it isn't raining. I've never seen anyone deny reality this hard, even here.
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/12/20/technology/silicon-valley...
https://www.paymentsdive.com/news/blockchain-startups-landed...
https://originstamp.com/blog/top-blockchain-startups-to-watc...
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/02/02/crypto-start-ups-raised-huge...
https://www.institutionalinvestor.com/article/b1w6r1v3pjg15s...
https://bitcoinke.io/2022/02/crypto-startups-in-january-2022...
https://blockworks.co/report-vcs-invested-33b-in-crypto-and-...
https://fortune.com/2021/12/01/investors-fund-crypto-startup...
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-02-01/new-york-...
https://news.crunchbase.com/news/private-crypto-vc-funding-u...
Anyway, this is public so I can always just link to it.
This is what you said. Stop pretending you didn't say this and give some evidence.
The New York Times article alone says:
Investors, too, have flooded in. They have poured more than $28 billion into global crypto and blockchain start-ups this year, four times the total in 2020, according to PitchBook, a firm that tracks private investments. More than $3 billion has gone into NFT companies alone.
More than 28 billion dollars into start ups in one year.
Anyway, this is public so I can always just link to it.
Oh yeah? Twelve comments deep and you're now threatening to maybe actually link some evidence (in the future)?.
How is this not embarrassing to you? Do you try to convince people the sky is red and the earth is flat?
Why do you keep replying without evidence? Because it doesn't exist. If it did, you would have linked it already.
https://www.cbinsights.com/research/report/blockchain-trends...
That’s why I was curious about which data you’re basing the statement on. Was wondering if it was wallets, inflows, etc.
If you’re unclear, coins are supposed to be fungible where NFT’s shouldn’t be.