Hacker News Reader

Comment by petmon | Hacker News Reader

Are you affiliated with this site? If so, please make a post introducing yourself.

Hi! I’m @mtomweb on Twitter. I and everyone one else doesn’t work or get paid by any of the browser vendors (or anyone else for that matter). I run a small business doing POS systems that’d you’d have never heard off.

People just assume that we’re funded because we’ve stuck a lot of effort in trying to fight anticompetitive behavior. If you read our content though you’ll see it’s not legal/PR nonsense.

Available on Twitter or discord for chat anytime!

I would advise you that if you are trying to fight anticompetitive behavior, you are backing the wrong horse. Apple is not good, but it is useful in fighting what's truly bad: Google's attempt to turn the web into a walled garden. Read a bit about "Project NERA" online.

Google's constant stream of web "standards" only they've implemented, AMP (which thankfully is starting to die), and Privacy Sandbox all fold into a plan to control the web.

You might not be paid by them, but please don't take on the "useful idiot" role of helping them control the web because you didn't understand the impact of what you were promoting.

I'm well aware of your long held opinions but really we are advocating on behalf of people who believe the web is the future. Additionally we believe in competition and browser choice. There will always be others who think that other platforms are a better option, but as long as there is open competition, the best platform will win.

Our aim is to remove barriers and we will fight any anti-competitive behaviour by any operating system or browser vendor but in a priority order.

I believe in competition and browser choice. But if your position was to win, we would immediately have neither. You are advocating solely for Chrome, whether you understand why and how or not.

Priorities are great to have, but yours are wrong and harmful. If you win, we all lose, and I fear you will come to understand it too late.

I'm not advocating solely for chrome. Safari/webkit was severely underfunded and neglected by Apple and was slipping further behind every year in addition to being unsuitable / unstable as an application platform. By restoring competition to iOS it will push Apple to fund them properly or they risk losing 150m for each 1% of users per year that move to another browser.

Safari only competes on one platform and that is MacOS.

If you read through our regulatory submission at https://open-web-advocacy.org/#where we run through this argument in detail.

It should also be important to note that blink is a fork of webkit which is a fork of khtml. There is nothing stoping competition within the chromium browsers as outlined in section 8 of the document.

We want Safari/webkit to succeed.

Choosing not to implement insecure and poorly thought out features isn't "underfunding" or "neglecting" Safari. It's a choice to put users, not Google, first.

Google has used a litany of underhanded tactics to obliterate every single browser in an open space. Claiming opening up iOS to competing browsers would be helping Safari succeed is just ignoring history.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com