All you’ve said is the laptop was his.
That’s not a story at all, and not the reason the story was rotten.
This reads like you’re not being very honest about the actual story that was being sold to news organizations.
That’s not a story at all, and not the reason the story was rotten.
This reads like you’re not being very honest about the actual story that was being sold to news organizations.
Your not being honest with your motives to deny the guardian stories points or the fact that article even exists, do you not want to admit there is something potentially shady happening?
I don't know with 100% certainty either way honestly, I would have wanted the story to be covered if it was any other politician (and don't like trump, glad he lost tbh) so I am not sure what bone your trying to pick at. (this comment goes deeper into what was potentially found if you are interested https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30548675)