PC user don't pay 4k for a computer, on PC you can get 2x the speed for 2x less the price.
Check your replies in 10 years and I'll be able to list a dozen ;P
But sarcasm aside yeah this chip looks insane.
For graphic card I don't try to argue because fps on Mac are very inferior in games than a average modern card. It's not even on the same league.
The M1 is as fast as the 1650. I'm getting great frame rates at 1440P High on X-Plane
> It took less than 6month to have a faster amd / intel CPU than the m1 back then, Apple charts are showing performance / watt which for a desktop PC is kind of irrelevant. In pure speed amd / intel are faster or will be very soon.
Perf/Watt is very relevant. Electricity costs money and you also want a cool room.
I'm almost certain that's not true, especially for machines that would compete with the Studio
> on PC you can get 2x the speed for 2x less the price.
Citation needed. This hasn't been true for a long time as far as I can tell.
Of course Apple chips won’t work well for gaming, but what other benchmarks will this $2000 desktop win?
Your $400 CPU needs at least another $1000 in parts just to boot (and those aren't even the parts you likely want to pair with it).
Your cost comparison is silly. Nobody compares singular CPUs to entire machines.