> Who are they to decide what is "disinformation". How do they know?
Making decisions about which information to rank highly vs. lowly is, you know, kind of the definition of a search engine.
Making decisions about which information to rank highly vs. lowly is, you know, kind of the definition of a search engine.
Misinformation is a kind of information.
You say that as if being "anti censorship" is a weird, or bad thing. What reasonable person would agree that being "pro censorship" is an ideal stance?
I believe, at a fundamental level, this statement is far too ambiguous to be considered a reasonable conclusion.