How did this many deaths become normal?
theatlantic.com
theatlantic.com
> America is accepting not only a threshold of death but also a gradient of death. Elderly people over the age of 75 are 140 times more likely to die than people in their 20s.
The author thinks we shouldn't be accepting of the fact that people in the last stage of their lives have a higher death rate than the people in the prime of their lives?
> It often occurs because of active distortion by politicians and the press, Lewandowsky told me. (For example, a poll that found that mask mandates are favored by 50 percent of Americans and opposed by just 28 percent was nonetheless framed in terms of waning support.)
I think the author has it backwards. The 50% support mask mandates is due to politicians and the press not the 28%. After all, 100% of americans were against mask mandates prior to the politicians and the press pushing mask mandates.
The media will say overpopulation is the cause of climate change and we should feel bad and we need less people. Then they'll say we should feel bad because a few hundred thousand more people died in the US than normal. No matter what, we should be scared, sad, angry, depressed, etc. Then they'll peddle pharmaceutical ads.
A lot of people died from covid who otherwise wouldn't have (yet). That's not to say I agree with our failed strategy, but if we can't even believe that covid did kill a bunch of people, eh... nevermind. The country is doomed anyway lol.
Yes! That makes PR/propaganda significantly easier which is valuable to the people in the PR/propaganda industry (the same people writing the news.) This is why you should tune out things that sound like propaganda.
All of these made a massive difference. Compare to Brazil where the average age of Covid death was only a little over 60, which means the vast majority of people who died there were under retirement age, many of them a lot under. That's what not taking the pandemic seriously looks like. I know Brazil has a younger population, but despite that meaning their demographics were strongly in their favour, they still suffered huge death rates.
The idea that coronavirus is only a problem for the very old, and countermeasures aren’t necessary to protect younger people (including middle aged people) is just obviously false when you look at countries like Brazil with 600,000 deaths, most of them of working age.
Of course it is natural!
You have to die of something. Old age weakens us to the point where the body either wears out directly or our cannot mount an adequate response to an otherwise 'ordinary' infection or injury.
We have done just the same with the HIV/AIDS pandemic, which is still ongoing by the way. People would be surprised to know how many people die of AIDS in the World each year.
And future does not look so bright either. Would not be surprised if we soon have to deal with a third pandemic at the same time.
I always think of the argument of Eliphaz in the book of Job. It’s interesting that we have this built in belief that illness is connected to moral failings.
Did you forget about lockdowns, mask mandates, the unprecedented speed at which we developed and deployed the vaccine, that all news for the last two years were almost all about covid (only recently displaced by the Ukraine war).
You call that normal?! Though it is a completely different thing, it almost makes 9/11 looks like a detail. With 9/11, we had a few days of cancelled flights, and more security checks, with covid, we had months when we couldn't fly at all, and the time we could, we had masks and tests, sometimes even quarantines. Covid is the most world-changing event since WW2.
And all that because we didn't want people to die. We could have let people die, humanity never was is danger of extinction or anything like that. In fact, it could have been a way to "help society get rid of the burden of the elderly" (a common theme among conspiracy theorists). But no, we wanted people to stay alive, as if we weren't monsters.
In fact, many people think we overdid it, a debatable position, but in any way, we are totally not considering it "normal".
As a society we've normalized individual freedom over collective lives as a new value, something which wasn't true in, say, the WW2 era of collective rationing. Half the country was fine letting millions die because they believed some youtuber on masks and vax.
There's 8 billion of us, millions are always going to be dying, and realistically nobody outside of their friend circles really care.