See; cookie banner laws, GDPR.
See; cookie banner laws, GDPR.
Case in point - look at github.com - they did the right thing. Or look at apple.com... or even gs.com.
Now every single website I have to dismiss a pop up before I visit. Yet once dismissed the site functions completely fine so really the law should have just made whatever happens when I click accept illegal because you clearly don’t need it for any of these services to function.
But no, now I have to dismiss a pop up every time instead.
> Yet once dismissed the site functions completely fine
This is one of the intended outcomes of the law, because it prevents companies denying service to those who do not wish to be tracked on an all-or-nothing basis. Which is something that was beginning to happen.
It may seem like there was no outcome from the legislation, but this is partly because it outlaws some outcomes. It's like the Y2K thing, when people tell you that it was all a fuss over nothing.
GDPR was never(and never intended to be) a technical law, it is by name "general"! You get the same "notification" if you walk into a public space where security cameras are installed.