Off-topic critique: what is this, graph porn? There are a lot of unnecessary graphs in there, the first graph doesn't add anything because, wow, historic look at how much Russia produced, you've already written the current number, who cares what it looked like over the last 20 years. The pie chart of where the oil is exported may be relevant, but do we really need to go into such detail? The first relevant graph to the article is the price spike caused by the invasion/sanctions.

Terrible presentation when the reader has to think "what is the significance of this graphic?" with sooo many of them. But hey, looks impressive at first glance and if this were high school it'd fill the minimum page requirements.