Hacker News Reader

Comment by AdmiralAsshat | Hacker News Reader

Does Google ever provide a rationale for why they continue to twist Android internals to use More Google?

Oh, just wait a while. Google employees will be logging in soon, you’ll see the rationale on this very thread!

Waiting for the obligatory "Googler here, not on the Android team, but here's my totally personal opinion why this is actually a good thing..."

My guess is that people who juggle multiple browsers and who want actively want a null default are nonexistent but the people who are confused when opening links after installing a second app that works as a http handler changing the flow are.

I'm one of those nonexistent people. I have Firefox for personal use and then Chrome for work stuff. Depending on the app launching the link, I choose the browser myself.

The new work profile container stuff has somewhat reduced the utility of this but it's not gone for me yet.

Same story. Got four different browsers I work with.

I use MS Edge for trusted websites and the ones I want to be logged into and DuckDuckGo browser for random pages and news articles which are normally filled with ads and tracking code.

A better thing is the TWRP option to "format system partition."

In fairness, that easily can be an actual personal opinion; consider that "people who work at Google" is almost certain to be filtered to "people who aren't too bothered by Google's behavior" in the first place, and then they work in an environment that exposes them to the values that create Google's behaviors.

Also consider that people are more likely to vocalize what they think their company is doing well as opposed to what they think their company is doing poorly in a public forum.

"That's an excellent question...."

I always felt Google regards Android as a mistake. It is too open. Just look at how iOS is printing money for Apple with its walled garden. And Google's Pixel line smartphones are not selling.

If they could do it all over again things would be very different.

I'm happy with the Pixel line, so I hope they don't try to redo them. Google tried to turn the Pixel phones into Google's iPhones ever since they dropped the Nexus branding.

It certainly helped when they bought half of HTC's engineers in 2017.

I loved the LG made Nexus phones a lot back the day. But yes HTC did build nice, solid phones as well.

Alphabet simply does not want to invest enough in R&D to develop devices as solid as Apple’s, nor do they want the expenses of in person support. Nothing has stopped them for the past 15 years from spending money to develop a similar locked down device and building out a network of retail stores.

They would rather leave the expensive hardware business to other companies since it does not scale as cheaply as slinging ads via software. Microsoft is guilty of the same. They are happy with the high margin rent from Azure/Windows/Office licensing, so why bother rolling the dice on expensive hardware development and support.

Given the recent investment in a custom chip, the opening of a store in NYC, massive ad spend for pixel, and statements on earnings calls noting hardware investment I don’t think it’s lack of desire. Nest and sundry Google Home devices far exceed Apple’s equivalent offerings.

I think the truth may be Apple just makes it look easy, and it’s really hard - even with the resources at Google’s disposal.

Oh no no no. They executed the MS playbook perfectly. Now it's just the time to cash in. It's "Google - The Ballmer Years".

They seem to be adding very little wrt. useful features, and resorting to pointless churn as we're seeing here. Unfortunately the most workable "open" alternative is the mainline Linux stack, which has yet to reach "daily driver" usability on any device. Sailfish is a non starter as it's just a closed UX on top of vendor kernels and drivers, only the middle layers are open.

Because they will not be developing an operating system completely for free? It makes no sense.

They don't. I paid them good money for hardware that contains the OS with updates for 4 years.

> I paid them good money

You think it was a good money, but they disagree and want (much) more.

>completely for free

Yeah, yeah. And the money they spend on it doesn't come for a multibillion ad business.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com