Hacker News Reader

Comment by 4140tm | Hacker News Reader

You are skipping a step there - it's red -> green -> refactor

As for "tactical programming instead of strategic design" - that's entirely up to the developer and how they approach the problem. if you are prone to neglecting the design you'll do it any way. If anything, (actually) practicing TDD would force you to come up with better design.

View on HN

How does TDD force you to a better design ?

By forcing you to think about your code's interface before thinking about its implementation. That means you get larger components that fit together based on the problem requirements, rather than components with interfaces that are only locally optimal.

You can see this same thing in action when watching functional programming live coding sessions: most live coding is bottom-up, but they still write the function signatures before writing any code.

This strikes me as tautological. If you're using anything statically typed you have to write the function signature before it's body.

Static typing is not synonymous with manifest typing (always require an explicit type declaration). Many functional languages can infer the type of an expression from its definition, so explicit type signatures are optional. These languages are still statically typed though.

It doesn't. It signals a particular point in time to improve the design.

Good design is a creative activity and cannot really be forced, only given space to grow.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com