If this is actually needed, then Mozilla needs to seriously rethink its life choices.
But so far, imho, no fork of Firefox has any point to it that a simple user.js can't fix. (Unless you're paranoid about the download IDs)
Delicate wording for being "Google's controlled opposition" or simply "Google's bitch".
> with the competitive salaries of that area.
At the time Mitchell Baker gets a raise up to 3mil/y to have a salary similar to "competitive roles elsewhere", Mozilla has 75% market share drop and loses developers due to inability to remunerate them. All for the benefit of Google pretending lack of monopoly and placing their malware on Mozilla's websites praising Mozilla's focus on privacy.
Today's Mozilla deserves no trust.
The same goes for most other software. It would be desirable for all cloud databases for example to hide their data and what being searched from the server, but that can be only done securely with an unpractical (logarithmic) communication or computation overhead (using searchable encryption).