Thank you for the explanation.
Submissions like this are when I wish HN didn't have the "original title" policy. It doesn't give you any context about a link and why someone should care about it.
Submissions like this are when I wish HN didn't have the "original title" policy. It doesn't give you any context about a link and why someone should care about it.
Many of them have very low information density, especially when they're just the name of some OSS project that's not famous.
"Sync for Thunderbird": My first thought was "that's still a thing?".
"Sync for Thunderbird: Open issue for 14 years" is more interesting and informative a title