They haven't all. Look up Asia Durr if you want an anecdote. #2 draft pick for WBNA and hasn't played since her rookie season due to long haul covid effects.
I am not aware of any study on covid in athletes in particular, though.
I am not aware of any study on covid in athletes in particular, though.
Edit: And to all the wonderful people who no doubt checked themselves to make sure they had expertise on the subject before they downvoted my question (!), here's some food for thought:
A 2021 study of 789 professional athletes found that only 5 (0.6%) had heart inflammation. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamacardiology/fullarticle/...
Another study found that COVID in athletes was rarely serious: "The severity of COVID-19 in elite athletes is predominantly mild and without complications. Athletes can return to sport after two symptom-free weeks and additional heart screening is usually not required." https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S144024402...
2021 review of 12 studies: "Athletes have an overall low risk of SARS-CoV-2 pericardial/myocardial involvement, arrhythmias and SCA/SCD." https://bmjopensem.bmj.com/content/7/4/e001164.abstract
2022 editorial review: "Most importantly, to date, there have been no acute adverse cardiac events reported as a direct consequence of COVID-19 infection in the athletes included in these large registries" and noted that the few smaller studies that deviated from these findings were badly designed. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8730531/
2022 study: "These data add to the growing body of the literature and agree with larger cohorts that the risk of cardiac involvement post-infection appears to be low among elite athletic and semi-professional athletic populations." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8791243/
2022 letter: "Several elite professional athletes tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. A few reports of persistent and residual symptoms of infections emerged. However, peak athletic performance in elite athletes did not seem to be affected, with some athletes recording historical performances both in the weeks following as well as several months after contracting the novel coronavirus.... These findings raise further awareness about the importance of performing regular physical activity and maintaining a favourable body composition and overall fitness, and emphasise the need for public health initiatives and actions to promote a healthy lifestyle on a population level." https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S14402...
The idea - however appealing to Americans and apparently hackers - that everyone is on an equal playing field of risk is absolute nonsense.
My original comment specifically highlights that the studies are split, but you are cherry-picking articles that support an argument you are trying to make that athletes aren’t suffering from heart inflammation.
Moreover, based on your initial question to my comment, you don’t even seem to be aware that heart inflammation isn’t necessarily going to effect performance, rather it presents potential longterm and acute risks of a negative outcome to the athletes, and you are specifically citing athlete performance as evidence athletes aren’t suffering from heart inflammation.
All things being equal it is probably better to be a young athlete with heart inflammation than to live a sedentary lifestyle and be obese with heart inflammation for purposes of health outcome, but I think you are confounding risk of having heart inflammation with risk of negative outcomes from heart inflammation. As research and studies continue it could very well be the risk of heart inflammation is in fact equal among the populace, while negative outcomes will be unequal, ultimately this is still going to drive up negative outcomes across the board.
"based on your initial question to my comment, you are specifically citing athlete performance as evidence athletes aren’t suffering from heart inflammation"
How did I "cite" that in a question? That WAS my question, the answer to which I found myself.